Elsevier

Leukemia Research

Volume 65, February 2018, Pages 29-33
Leukemia Research

Research paper
Perforin gene variation influences survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Common perforin gene variants influence overall survival in childhood ALL.

  • rs885822 GG genotype was associated with worse outcome, independent of risk group.

  • Perforin gene variation may influence mortality in childhood ALL.

Abstract

Although a growing body of data links mutations in the perforin gene with increased susceptibility to hematologic malignancies, no studies discuss their influence on the clinical course of such diseases. The present study examines the impact of perforin gene variation on the clinical outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. The study enrolled 312 children aged 1–18 years, treated for ALL. PRF1 gene variants were analyzed through direct DNA sequencing. Variation in rs885822 was found to be associated with overall survival: patients carrying the GG genotype demonstrated a significantly increased risk of death compared to those carrying the A allele, independently of ALL risk groups (HR 3.13, 95%CI 1.16–7.8, p = 0.014). The effect was even more pronounced in high-risk ALL patients (p = 0.006). On the other hand, the presence of the rs35947132 minor A allele was slightly protective with regard to overall prognosis (p = 0.047). No differences in relapse-free survival were observed with regard to genotypes. The results of the study may imply that perforin gene variation has a role in modifying mortality in childhood ALL.

Introduction

Perforin is a pore-forming protein stored in the acidic secretory granules of cytotoxic lymphocytes [1]. Perforin-mediated cytotoxicity is crucial in killing transformed cells and cells harboring intracellular pathogens; it is also involved in downmodulation of the immune response by inducing apoptosis of effector lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells [[2], [3], [4]].

The belief that perforin is critical for immune homeostasis and tumor immune surveillance is supported by the spectrum of pathologies associated with perforin deficiency [5]. Perforin-depleted (Prf1−/−) mice are highly immunosuppressed and susceptible to diverse intracellular pathogens [6], as well as to transplanted [7], virus-induced [8] and spontaneous malignancies, primarily to aggressive B-cell lymphomas [9]. Perforin has also been shown to play an important role in NK-cell mediated suppression of tumor metastasis [10] and in controlling the growth of carcinogen-induced sarcoma [11]. In humans, biallelic PRF1 gene mutations are well recognized as the cause of 20–50% of familial heamophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL2) [[12], [13], [14], [15]], a severe hyperinflammatory syndrome with uncontrolled activation of antigen-presenting cells, CD8+ T cells and massive cytokinaemia [16]. Recent studies also describe the presence of perforin-dependent immune surveillance in humans. Carriers of mutant PRF1 were shown to suffer more frequently from relatively early-onset melanoma – a malignancy in which CD8+ T cells may play a role in the prevention of disease progression and metastatis [17]. Both mono- and biallelic PRF1 gene mutations have also been found in a proportion of patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas [[18], [19], [20]]. A limited number of studies on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the single most common pediatric malignancy [21], have provided contradictory results: the A91V polymorphism was identified as an ALL-predisposing factor in a relatively small group of children [22], but was not confirmed on a larger cohort [23]. It was also suggested that perforin mutation may be more prevalent in ALL with BCR-ABL1 translocation [24].

As perforin plays a pivotal role in maintaining immune homeostasis, not only regarding tumor immune surveillance, but also pathogen defense and immune regulation, the aim of the present study is to examine the impact of perforin gene variation on the clinical outcome in pediatric ALL patients. As such, this is the only study so far to address the role of perforin in the clinical course of ALL.

Section snippets

The study population

The study enrolled 312 children aged 1–18 years, treated for ALL in reference centers of the Polish Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group between April 20 and September 2015. The diagnosis, risk group assignment and treatment were performed according to the guidelines of BFM ALL-IC 2002 and BFM ALL-IC 2009 Protocols, as described before [25]. Clinical variables are presented in Table 1. The Ethics Committee approved the research protocol and informed consent was obtained from all participants

Distribution of PRF1 allele frequencies in ALL patients and in controls

The sequencing of coding exons and exon-intron boundaries of PRF1 gene revealed many genetic variants (see Supplementary Table S1).

Out of these, three polymorphic sites with MAF (minor allele frequency) >0.05: rs885822, rs885821 and rs35947132 were found in the study group. All three SNPs were in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group (p = 0.15, p = 0.29 and p = 1.0, respectively). Moreover, rs885822 and rs35947132 SNPs were in complete linkage disequilibrium (D’ = 1, in that A

Discussion and conclusions

After identification of loss-of-function perforin mutation as the cause of FHL2 in 1999 [15], it was observed that FHL can sometimes be greatly delayed in carriers of biallelic PRF1 gene mutations [28]. It was later shown that a large proportion of these patients develop either leukemia or lymphoma [29]. Since then, perforin mutations have been linked with a spectrum of human malignancies [30]. All previous studies on the topic, however, have so far focused on rare genetic variants and their

Contributions

AJ performed genetic studies in leukemia patients and wrote the draft of the manuscript, AP and JT collected clinical data for survival analysis, KW and RP performed genetic studies in the control group, MB performed genetic studies in leukemia patients, WF performed statistical analysis, LS and TS provided clinical data in leukemia patients, WM designed the study and prepared the final version of the manuscript. Wojciech Mlynarski is the guarantor of the study and, as such, had full access to

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their families for agreeing to participate in this study. This study was supported by National Science Center grant No 2011/03/N/NZ5/04363 and Medical University of Lodz grant No 502-03/1-090-01/502-14-161.

References (39)

  • E.R. Podack et al.

    Isolation and biochemical and functional characterization of perforin 1 from cytolytic T-cell granules

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1985)
  • M.W. Su et al.

    Fratricide of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes is dependent on cellular activation and perforin-mediated killing

    Eur. J. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    Critical role for perforin-, Fas/FasL-, and TNFR1-mediated cytotoxic pathways in down-regulation of antigen-specific T cells during persistent viral infection

    J. Virol.

    (2002)
  • I. Voskoboinik et al.

    Perforin: structure, function, and role in human immunopathology

    Immunol. Rev.

    (2010)
  • M.E. van den Broek et al.

    Decreased tumor surveillance in perforin-deficient mice

    J. Exp. Med.

    (1996)
  • M.J. Smyth et al.

    Perforin-mediated cytotoxicity is critical for surveillance of spontaneous lymphoma

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2000)
  • M.J. Smyth et al.

    Perforin is a major contributor to NK cell control of tumor metastasis

    J. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • E.K. Goransdotter et al.

    Spectrum of perforin gene mutations in familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2001)
  • G.E. Janka

    Familial and acquired hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

    Annu. Rev. Med.

    (2012)
  • View full text